Williams v Williams & Ors [2022] EWHC 1717 (Ch) (04 July 2022)
Neither Cefn Coed nor Crythan were intended to be partnership assets; Dorian's proprietary estoppel claim fails as assurances were conditional, reliance unreasonable, and no unconscionable detriment established; partnership dissolved on Mrs Williams' death, assets to be divided between estate and Dorian; testamentary dispositions govern farm ownership.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1717 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Lloyd Dorian Williams; Defendant: Gerwyn Lloyd Williams; Defendant: Susan Elizabeth Ham; Defendant: Sara Llewellyn Jones; Defendant: John Alun Lloyd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Property/trust/probate Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Partnership Assets, Proprietary Estoppel, Beneficial Ownership, Testamentary Disposition, Farm Succession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lloyd Dorian Williams
Claimant
Gerwyn Lloyd Williams
Defendant
Susan Elizabeth Ham
Defendant
Sara Llewellyn Jones
Defendant
John Alun Lloyd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Property/trust/probate Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Cefn Coed and Crythan farms are partnership assets
- 2 Whether proprietary estoppel entitles Dorian to ownership of the farms
- 3 Whether Gerwyn became a partner in the farming business
Ratio Decidendi
Neither Cefn Coed nor Crythan were intended to be partnership assets; Dorian's proprietary estoppel claim fails as assurances were conditional, reliance unreasonable, and no unconscionable detriment established; partnership dissolved on Mrs Williams' death, assets to be divided between estate and Dorian; testamentary dispositions govern farm ownership.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Crythan remains vested in Susan
- Cefn Coed held as tenancy in common; Mr Williams' share passes under will to Gerwyn and Susan
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment