EWQ v GFD [2012] EWHC 2182 (QB) (30 July 2012)
The Claimant is likely to establish that publication of details of his sexual relationship with the Defendant, details of his relationship with his wife and children, and details of other sexual relationships should not be allowed. The Defendant's threats and conduct amount to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Material non-disclosure by the Claimant was not established as sufficiently material to justify discharge of the injunction. The court may grant an injunction even if it assists in a deception, where the interests of the family and children outweigh the Defendant's Article 10 rights.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 2182
- Parties
- Claimant: EWQ; Defendant: GFD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Privacy and Harassment / Interim Injunction Hearing
- Outcome
- Interim injunction continued with modifications
- Legal Topics
- Misuse of Private Information, Protection From Harassment Act 1997, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR, Material Non Disclosure, Interim Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EWQ
Claimant
GFD
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Privacy and Harassment / Interim Injunction Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant has a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding the information threatened to be disclosed
- 2 Whether the Defendant's conduct amounts to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
- 3 Whether material non-disclosure by the Claimant justifies discharge of the injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant is likely to establish that publication of details of his sexual relationship with the Defendant, details of his relationship with his wife and children, and details of other sexual relationships should not be allowed. The Defendant's threats and conduct amount to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Material non-disclosure by the Claimant was not established as sufficiently material to justify discharge of the injunction. The court may grant an injunction even if it assists in a deception, where the interests of the family and children outweigh the Defendant's Article 10 rights.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction continued with modifications
Orders
- Defendant restrained from disclosing private information about the Claimant as specified in the Confidential Schedule
- Defendant restrained from pursuing a course of conduct amounting to harassment of the Claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment