EWQ v GFD [2012] EWHC 1907 (QB) (12 July 2012)

EWQ v GFD [2012] EWHC 1907 (QB) (12 July 2012)

The court granted a non-disclosure order and harassment injunction because the Defendant's conduct posed a real risk of harm, the information was private and confidential, and there was no public interest in disclosure. Anonymity was necessary to protect both parties at this stage.

Citation
[2012] EWHC 1907 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: EWQ; Defendant: GFD
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Harassment Injunction / Interim Order, Return Date Hearing
Outcome
Interim injunction and non-disclosure order continued; undertakings accepted; parties anonymised.
Legal Topics
Protection From Harassment Act 1997, Non Disclosure Orders, Anonymity in Proceedings
Civil Procedure Privacy Law Harassment Protection From Harassment Act 1997 Non Disclosure Orders Anonymity in Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EWQ

Claimant

GFD

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Harassment Injunction / Interim Order, Return Date Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant's conduct amounts to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
  2. 2 Whether a non-disclosure order should be granted to protect private and confidential information
  3. 3 Whether anonymity for both parties is justified at this stage

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted a non-disclosure order and harassment injunction because the Defendant's conduct posed a real risk of harm, the information was private and confidential, and there was no public interest in disclosure. Anonymity was necessary to protect both parties at this stage.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction and non-disclosure order continued; undertakings accepted; parties anonymised.

Orders

  • Defendant prohibited from harassing Claimant
  • Defendant prohibited from disclosing private information