RAR v GGC
The court exercised its discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to allow the claim to proceed out of time, finding the claimant's delay justified by her psychiatric injuries resulting from the abuse. The court found the claimant's evidence credible, accepted the abuse occurred as alleged, and held the defendant civilly liable. Damages were assessed for pain, suffering, loss of amenity, aggravated damages, past and future loss of earnings, and treatment costs.
- Parties
- Claimant: RAR; Defendant: GGC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (personal Injury / Sexual Assault) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Limitation Period, Damages Assessment, Aggravated Damages, Evidential Burden, Section 33 Limitation Act Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RAR
Claimant
GGC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (personal Injury / Sexual Assault) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should exercise discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to allow the claim to proceed out of time
- 2 Whether the defendant perpetrated the alleged physical and sexual assaults
- 3 Causation and extent of personal injury and loss
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to allow the claim to proceed out of time, finding the claimant's delay justified by her psychiatric injuries resulting from the abuse. The court found the claimant's evidence credible, accepted the abuse occurred as alleged, and held the defendant civilly liable. Damages were assessed for pain, suffering, loss of amenity, aggravated damages, past and future loss of earnings, and treatment costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant
Orders
- The defendant shall pay the claimant £470,034.90 in damages and interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment