Rothy's Inc v Giesswein Walkwaren AG
The Defendant's Pointy Flat shoe infringes the Claimant's Registered Community Design because it produces the same overall impression on the informed user, particularly due to the use of a knitted heavy yarn upper, which was a significant departure from the design corpus. The RCD and UCD are valid as they produce a different overall impression from the prior designs. However, the Defendant did not copy the UCD, as the evidence showed independent creation and no access to the Pointed Loafer, so the UCD was not infringed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Rothy’s Inc; Defendant: Giesswein Walkwaren AG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property/design Infringement and Invalidity Claim / Judgment After Remote Trial
- Outcome
- Claimant succeeds in part; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Registered Community Design (rcd) Infringement, Unregistered Community Design (ucd) Infringement, Design Invalidity, Design Corpus, Copying in Design Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rothy’s Inc
Claimant
Giesswein Walkwaren AG
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property/design Infringement and Invalidity Claim / Judgment After Remote Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant's Pointy Flat shoe infringes the Claimant's Registered Community Design (RCD) and/or Unregistered Community Design (UCD)
- 2 Whether the RCD and UCD are invalid for lack of individual character over prior designs (Allegra K and Bonnibel)
- 3 Whether the Defendant copied the UCD
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant's Pointy Flat shoe infringes the Claimant's Registered Community Design because it produces the same overall impression on the informed user, particularly due to the use of a knitted heavy yarn upper, which was a significant departure from the design corpus. The RCD and UCD are valid as they produce a different overall impression from the prior designs. However, the Defendant did not copy the UCD, as the evidence showed independent creation and no access to the Pointed Loafer, so the UCD was not infringed.
Court Disposition
Claimant succeeds in part; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the Defendant's Pointy Flat infringes the Claimant's Registered Community Design (RCD)
- Declaration that the RCD and UCD are valid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment