Walter Lilly & Company Ltd v MacKay & Anor [2012] EWHC 1972 (TCC) (17 July 2012)
The Claimant was entitled to contractual interest at Bank of England Base Rate plus 5% on sums wrongfully withheld, with discretionary interest awarded for periods not covered by the contract. The Defendants' conduct, including failure to engage with reasonable settlement offers and unreasonable litigation tactics, justified costs on a standard basis up to 11 November 2011 and on an indemnity basis thereafter. The Claimant was awarded an interim payment of £1.9 million towards costs. The Defendants' application for extended time to pay was refused due to inadequate evidence of inability to pay.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 1972 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Walter Lilly & Company Limited; Defendant: Giles Patrick Cyril Mackay; Defendant: DMW Developments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Construction Dispute / Post Trial Judgment on Interest, Costs, and Interim Payment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant on interest and costs; interim payment ordered; application for extended time to pay refused.
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Judgment Debts, Costs (standard and Indemnity Basis), Interim Payments, Offers to Settle (part 36), Contractual Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walter Lilly & Company Limited
Claimant
Giles Patrick Cyril Mackay
Defendant
DMW Developments Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Construction Dispute / Post Trial Judgment on Interest, Costs, and Interim Payment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to contractual and discretionary interest under the contract
- 2 Basis for awarding costs (standard or indemnity)
- 3 Appropriateness and quantum of interim payment of costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant was entitled to contractual interest at Bank of England Base Rate plus 5% on sums wrongfully withheld, with discretionary interest awarded for periods not covered by the contract. The Defendants' conduct, including failure to engage with reasonable settlement offers and unreasonable litigation tactics, justified costs on a standard basis up to 11 November 2011 and on an indemnity basis thereafter. The Claimant was awarded an interim payment of £1.9 million towards costs. The Defendants' application for extended time to pay was refused due to inadequate evidence of inability to pay.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant on interest and costs; interim payment ordered; application for extended time to pay refused.
Orders
- Defendants to pay contractual and discretionary interest totaling £593,779.
- Defendants to pay Claimant's costs on a standard basis up to 11 November 2011 and on an indemnity basis thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment