Walter Lilly & Company Ltd v Mackay & Anor
Legal professional or legal advice privilege does not apply to documents generated by Knowles Ltd because Knowles was not retained as solicitors or barristers, and the Defendants have not established that the individuals concerned were practising as such. The fact that the Defendants believed they were receiving...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Walter Lilly & Company Limited; Defendant: Giles Patrick Cyril Mackay; Defendant: DMW Developments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure
- Outcome
- Application for disclosure granted
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Disclosure of Documents, Claims Consultants, Legal Advice Privilege
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walter Lilly & Company Limited
Claimant
Giles Patrick Cyril Mackay
Defendant
DMW Developments Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents generated by or towards a claims consultant attract legal professional privilege
- 2 Whether Knowles Ltd was retained as solicitors or barristers for the purpose of privilege
- 3 Whether the timing and burden of the disclosure application should defeat it
Ratio Decidendi
Legal professional or legal advice privilege does not apply to documents generated by Knowles Ltd because Knowles was not retained as solicitors or barristers, and the Defendants have not established that the individuals concerned were practising as such. The fact that the Defendants believed they were receiving legal advice from lawyers is immaterial when the organisation was not retained in that capacity.
Court Disposition
Application for disclosure granted
Orders
- Defendants to provide disclosure of all relevant Knowles documents not covered by litigation privilege
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment