GK v HX
The mother’s assertion that she will not return with F is unlikely to be sustained; protective measures in Australia are sufficient to mitigate any risk. There is not a grave risk of harm or intolerable situation for F either by separation from the mother or by return with her. The Article 13(b) defence is not made out.
- Parties
- Applicant: GK; Respondent: HX
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 Application / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted; summary return order issued.
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention 1980, Article 13(b) Defence, Summary Return Order, Grave Risk of Harm, Protective Measures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GK
Applicant
HX
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 Application / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the return of F to Australia would expose him to grave risk of physical or psychological harm or place him in an intolerable situation under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention
- 2 Likelihood of the mother returning to Australia with F
- 3 Effectiveness of protective measures in Australia
Ratio Decidendi
The mother’s assertion that she will not return with F is unlikely to be sustained; protective measures in Australia are sufficient to mitigate any risk. There is not a grave risk of harm or intolerable situation for F either by separation from the mother or by return with her. The Article 13(b) defence is not made out.
Court Disposition
Application granted; summary return order issued.
Orders
- F must be returned to Australia by 11.59 pm GMT on Tuesday 10 December 2024.
- If the mother refuses to return with F, she must hand F over to the father by Monday 8 December 2024 for the father to accompany F to Australia.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment