GK v PR
The trial judge's failure to consider and apply the mandatory rules on vulnerable witnesses, absence of a ground rules hearing, failure to consider the impact of GK's vulnerability on her evidence, insufficient consideration of corroborative evidence, and an overly linear approach to the allegations rendered the findings unsafe and unsustainable. The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for rehearing.
- Parties
- Applicant: GK; Respondent: PR
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; findings set aside; matter remitted for rehearing
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Abuse, Vulnerable Witnesses, Fact Finding Hearings, Appeals, Child Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GK
Applicant
PR
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge failed to apply the rules on vulnerable witnesses (Part 3A FPR 2010, PD3AA, PD12J)
- 2 Whether the judge erred in dismissing allegations of rape, verbal, emotional, and physical abuse
- 3 Whether the judge failed to consider corroborative evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's failure to consider and apply the mandatory rules on vulnerable witnesses, absence of a ground rules hearing, failure to consider the impact of GK's vulnerability on her evidence, insufficient consideration of corroborative evidence, and an overly linear approach to the allegations rendered the findings unsafe and unsustainable. The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; findings set aside; matter remitted for rehearing
Orders
- Matter remitted to Chelmsford Family Court for rehearing
- Directions hearing to consider ground rules, participation directions, and case management
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment