Creative Resins International Ltd. v Glasslam Europe Ltd.

Creative Resins International Ltd. v Glasslam Europe Ltd.

Permission to amend the Particulars of Claim is refused because the proposed amendments are weak, lack evidence of publication within the jurisdiction, and do not justify the complexity and cost added to the case. The overriding objective requires proportionate and expeditious handling, and the claim sought by amendment does not meet these criteria.

Parties
Claimant: Creative Resins International Ltd; Defendant: Glasslam Europe Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Application for Permission to Amend Particulars of Claim
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Libel, Amendment of Pleadings, Jurisdiction, Limitation Period, Qualified Privilege
Defamation Civil Procedure Libel Amendment of Pleadings Jurisdiction Limitation Period Qualified Privilege

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Creative Resins International Ltd

Claimant

Glasslam Europe Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Application for Permission to Amend Particulars of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission should be granted to amend the Particulars of Claim to include allegations regarding website publication and press release
  2. 2 Whether the First Defendant is responsible for publication of defamatory material on the website
  3. 3 Whether the claim regarding website publication is statute barred

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to amend the Particulars of Claim is refused because the proposed amendments are weak, lack evidence of publication within the jurisdiction, and do not justify the complexity and cost added to the case. The overriding objective requires proportionate and expeditious handling, and the claim sought by amendment does not meet these criteria.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to amend Particulars of Claim refused