Contigroup Companies Inc v Glencore AG
Glencore is entitled to set off the sum of US$172,899.67 against Contichem’s claim, as there was no available market for substitute butane, the settlement with Petrochina was reasonable and solely referable to delay, and such loss was within the contemplation of the parties.
- Parties
- Claimant: Contigroup Companies, Inc.; Defendant: Glencore A.G.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Set-off allowed; judgment for Glencore on the counterclaim to the extent of the settlement amount.
- Legal Topics
- Damages for Late Delivery, Measure of Damages, Set Off, Available Market, Reasonableness of Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Contigroup Companies, Inc.
Claimant
Glencore A.G.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Glencore is entitled to set off damages for late delivery against Contichem's claim for the price of butane
- 2 Whether there was an available market for substitute butane
- 3 Whether the settlement between Glencore International and Petrochina was reasonable and referable to delay
Ratio Decidendi
Glencore is entitled to set off the sum of US$172,899.67 against Contichem’s claim, as there was no available market for substitute butane, the settlement with Petrochina was reasonable and solely referable to delay, and such loss was within the contemplation of the parties.
Court Disposition
Set-off allowed; judgment for Glencore on the counterclaim to the extent of the settlement amount.
Orders
- Glencore entitled to set off US$172,899.67 against Contichem’s claim for the price of Lot 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment