Richardson v Glencore UK Ltd & Ors
Late requests to vacate oral case management conferences disrupt court business, indicate inadequate preparation, and do not meet the procedural requirements for paper conferences; such requests should not be made except in rare and exceptional cases, and failure to comply may attract sanctions.
- Parties
- Claimant: Lionel Richardson; Defendant: Glencore UK Ltd; Defendant: Glencore International Ltd; Defendant: Appleby Trust (Jersey) Ltd; Defendant: Glencore Energy UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / First Case Management Conference
- Outcome
- directions given for fresh statements of case; costs order for transcript only
- Legal Topics
- Case Management, Pre Trial Directions, Expert Evidence, Foreign Law, Costs Sanctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lionel Richardson
Claimant
Glencore UK Ltd
Defendant
Glencore International Ltd
Defendant
Appleby Trust (Jersey) Ltd
Defendant
Glencore Energy UK Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / First Case Management Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 whether a paper case management conference is appropriate
- 2 failure to comply with procedural requirements
- 3 adequacy of statements of case
Ratio Decidendi
Late requests to vacate oral case management conferences disrupt court business, indicate inadequate preparation, and do not meet the procedural requirements for paper conferences; such requests should not be made except in rare and exceptional cases, and failure to comply may attract sanctions.
Court Disposition
directions given for fresh statements of case; costs order for transcript only
Orders
- Fresh particulars of claim to be filed setting out contracts, breaches, and reliefs.
- Urgent transcript of judgment to be prepared; costs to be borne one-third by claimant, one-third by first and fourth defendants, one-third by third defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment