Morris & Anor v Glendore Investments Ltd.

Morris & Anor v Glendore Investments Ltd.

The option was validly exercised within the extended period as provided by the agreement's Third Schedule, and no express or implied term negated this effect. Glendore acted in good faith and for a proper purpose, and the Morris brothers acquiesced in Glendore's actions, making it unconscionable for them to deny the option's validity. The claim fails and the counterclaims succeed.

Parties
Claimant: Raymond Anthony Morris; Claimant: Charles Alan Morris; Defendant: Glendore Investments Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed; counterclaims allowed.
Legal Topics
Option Agreements, Specific Performance, Implied Terms, Estoppel, Planning Permission
Contract Law Property Law Option Agreements Specific Performance Implied Terms Estoppel Planning Permission

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Raymond Anthony Morris

Claimant

Charles Alan Morris

Claimant

Glendore Investments Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Glendore validly exercised the option to purchase the property under the agreement.
  2. 2 Whether Glendore's conduct breached express or implied terms of the agreement, including obligations of good faith and proper purpose.
  3. 3 Whether the Morris brothers are estopped from denying the validity of the option exercise due to their acquiescence.

Ratio Decidendi

The option was validly exercised within the extended period as provided by the agreement's Third Schedule, and no express or implied term negated this effect. Glendore acted in good faith and for a proper purpose, and the Morris brothers acquiesced in Glendore's actions, making it unconscionable for them to deny the option's validity. The claim fails and the counterclaims succeed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; counterclaims allowed.

Orders

  • Specific performance granted for sale of property to Glendore Investments Ltd.
  • Repayment of £142,250 advanced by Glendore to the Morris brothers.