Glidepath Holding BV & Ors v Thompson & Ors [2005] EWCA Civ 1071 (28 July 2005)
It is inappropriate to use CPR 5.4(5) in one set of proceedings to obtain documents for use in another forum; the proper course is to apply in the relevant proceedings. There is no realistic prospect of success on appeal against the refusal of disclosure or the costs order.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1071
- Parties
- Applicant: Glidepath Holding BV & Ors; Respondent: Thompson & Ors; Applicant (in Person): Mr Onwuka; First Defendant: Mr John Thompson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal, Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Order
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Costs Orders, Use of Court Documents in Other Proceedings, CPR 5.4(5), Employment Tribunal Procedure, Freezing Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glidepath Holding BV & Ors
Applicant
Thompson & Ors
Respondent
Mr Onwuka
Applicant (in Person)
Mr John Thompson
First Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal, Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to disclosure of documents from the court file under CPR 5.4(5) for use in other proceedings
- 2 Whether the costs order against the applicant was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
It is inappropriate to use CPR 5.4(5) in one set of proceedings to obtain documents for use in another forum; the proper course is to apply in the relevant proceedings. There is no realistic prospect of success on appeal against the refusal of disclosure or the costs order.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- No order altering the costs order of Colman J
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment