London Capital & Finance Plc v Global Security Trustees Ltd [2020] EWHC 597 (Ch) (13 February 2020)
GST should pay LCF's costs on the indemnity basis because GST unreasonably resisted removal as trustee, failed to address conflicts of interest, and acted in its own commercial interests rather than as fiduciary. GST is not entitled to indemnity for its own costs or liability to pay LCF's costs under the Security Trust Deed, as these were not reasonably and properly incurred and amounted to wilful misconduct.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 597 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: London Capital & Finance Plc (in Administration); Defendant: Global Security Trustees Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Removal and Replacement of Trustee and Related Relief / Post Judgment, Consequential Issues and Costs
- Outcome
- Claimant's application for costs granted; costs to be paid by Defendant on indemnity basis; payment on account ordered; Defendant's claim for indemnity dismissed; other issues adjourned or left for further application.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Trustee, Costs Orders, Trustee Indemnity, Appointment of Replacement Trustee
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London Capital & Finance Plc (in Administration)
Claimant
Global Security Trustees Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Claim for Removal and Replacement of Trustee and Related Relief / Post Judgment, Consequential Issues and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether GST should pay LCF's costs and on what basis
- 2 Whether GST is entitled to indemnity for its costs and liability under the Security Trust Deed
- 3 Whether the Security Trust Deed needs to be assigned to the new trustee
Ratio Decidendi
GST should pay LCF's costs on the indemnity basis because GST unreasonably resisted removal as trustee, failed to address conflicts of interest, and acted in its own commercial interests rather than as fiduciary. GST is not entitled to indemnity for its own costs or liability to pay LCF's costs under the Security Trust Deed, as these were not reasonably and properly incurred and amounted to wilful misconduct.
Court Disposition
Claimant's application for costs granted; costs to be paid by Defendant on indemnity basis; payment on account ordered; Defendant's claim for indemnity dismissed; other issues adjourned or left for further application.
Orders
- GST to pay LCF's costs of the claim on the indemnity basis, subject to detailed assessment.
- GST to make a payment on account of £150,000 to LCF.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment