Gloucestershire City Council v AB (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) & Anor.
The standard authorisation is terminated as the care arrangements were not properly authorised or communicated to the relevant parties, and the current arrangements are so unplanned and risky that they require direct court authorisation. Interim authorisation is granted for the current care plan, with restrictions...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gloucestershire County Council; First Respondent: AB; Second Respondent: SB; Third Respondent: NHS Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection S.21 a Mental Capacity Act 2005 Application / Interim Order Following Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Interim orders granted; standard authorisation terminated; proceedings reconstituted under s.16 MCA 2005; further directions given.
- Legal Topics
- Deprivation of Liberty, Best Interests, Self Harm, Restraint, Article 2 ECHR, Article 5 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gloucestershire County Council
Applicant
AB
First Respondent
SB
Second Respondent
NHS Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection S.21 a Mental Capacity Act 2005 Application / Interim Order Following Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the best interests requirement is met for AB's deprivation of liberty and care arrangements
- 2 Whether the current care plan and authorisation process is lawful and appropriate
- 3 Whether AB has capacity to access the internet and social media
Ratio Decidendi
The standard authorisation is terminated as the care arrangements were not properly authorised or communicated to the relevant parties, and the current arrangements are so unplanned and risky that they require direct court authorisation. Interim authorisation is granted for the current care plan, with restrictions on AB's liberty and self-harm, as being in her best interests, necessary and proportionate, pending urgent review and further evidence.
Court Disposition
Interim orders granted; standard authorisation terminated; proceedings reconstituted under s.16 MCA 2005; further directions given.
Orders
- Standard authorisation dated 26 September 2022 is terminated.
- AB to reside at Placement A under the specified care plan.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment