Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc v Goodrich Corporation & Ors

Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc v Goodrich Corporation & Ors

RR Holdings validly exercised the PCOA Call Option against Goodrich, either by novation or contractual estoppel, and is entitled to delivery of the Call Option Exercise Preliminary Information Documents. Goodrich’s claims for breach of exclusivity obligations under the ASA and ECSURS fail. Goodrich is entitled to recover as a debt, or alternatively as damages, the difference between World List Price for 321 AECSUs supplied for the PAS and the amounts actually paid, amounting to US$112,285,440. Claims for injunction or specific performance are dismissed.

Parties
Claimant: Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC; Defendant: Goodrich Corporation; Third Party: Rolls-Royce PLC; Fourth Party: Rolls-Royce Total Care Services Limited; Fifth Party: Rolls-Royce Corporation; Sixth Party: Rolls-Royce Defense Services Inc; Seventh Party: Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG; Eighth Party: Rolls-Royce Brasil Limitada; Ninth Party: Rolls-Royce Canada Limited; Tenth Party: Rolls-Royce Controls and Data Services Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Commercial/contractual Dispute / Judgment After Full Trial
Outcome
Claimant (RR Holdings) succeeds on the PCOA Call Option; Goodrich succeeds in part on debt/damages for AECSUs; all other claims dismissed.
Legal Topics
Novation, Contractual Estoppel, Interpretation of Commercial Contracts, Breach of Exclusivity Obligations, Debt Claims, Damages Assessment
Contract Law Commercial Law Novation Contractual Estoppel Interpretation of Commercial Contracts Breach of Exclusivity Obligations Debt Claims Damages Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC

Claimant

Goodrich Corporation

Defendant

Rolls-Royce PLC

Third Party

Rolls-Royce Total Care Services Limited

Fourth Party

Rolls-Royce Corporation

Fifth Party

Rolls-Royce Defense Services Inc

Sixth Party

Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG

Seventh Party

Rolls-Royce Brasil Limitada

Eighth Party

Rolls-Royce Canada Limited

Ninth Party

Rolls-Royce Controls and Data Services Ltd

Tenth Party

Procedural Posture

Commercial/contractual Dispute / Judgment After Full Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether RR Holdings validly exercised the PCOA Call Option against Goodrich
  2. 2 Whether RR Holdings (and related entities) breached exclusivity obligations under the ASA and ECSURS
  3. 3 Whether Goodrich is entitled to damages or debt for alleged underpayment for AECSUs supplied for the PAS

Ratio Decidendi

RR Holdings validly exercised the PCOA Call Option against Goodrich, either by novation or contractual estoppel, and is entitled to delivery of the Call Option Exercise Preliminary Information Documents. Goodrich’s claims for breach of exclusivity obligations under the ASA and ECSURS fail. Goodrich is entitled to recover as a debt, or alternatively as damages, the difference between World List Price for 321 AECSUs supplied for the PAS and the amounts actually paid, amounting to US$112,285,440. Claims for injunction or specific performance are dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claimant (RR Holdings) succeeds on the PCOA Call Option; Goodrich succeeds in part on debt/damages for AECSUs; all other claims dismissed.

Orders

  • Declaration that RR Holdings validly exercised the PCOA Call Option by the Call Option Notice.
  • Order that Goodrich deliver the Call Option Exercise Preliminary Information Documents to RR Holdings forthwith.