NT 1 & Anor v Google LLC (Rev 2)
The court approved reporting restrictions and anonymity orders to prevent the claimants' identification, finding such measures necessary and proportionate to protect their privacy rights and the purpose of the proceedings, while balancing open justice. The Information Commissioner was permitted to intervene due to the public interest and relevance to regulatory functions.
- Parties
- Claimant: NT1; Claimant: NT2; Defendant: Google LLC; Intervenor: The Information Commissioner; Third Parties: Guardian News and Media Ltd, Times Newspapers Ltd, Telegraph Media Group Ltd, Associated Newspapers Ltd, News Group Newspapers Ltd, British Broadcasting Corporation & The Press Association
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Pre Trial Review
- Outcome
- Reporting restriction and anonymity orders granted; Information Commissioner permitted to intervene.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Forgotten, Reporting Restrictions, Anonymity Orders, Freedom of Expression, Spent Convictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NT1
Claimant
NT2
Claimant
Google LLC
Defendant
The Information Commissioner
Intervenor
Guardian News and Media Ltd, Times Newspapers Ltd, Telegraph Media Group Ltd, Associated Newspapers Ltd, News Group Newspapers Ltd, British Broadcasting Corporation & The Press Association
Third Parties
Procedural Posture
Civil / Pre Trial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reporting restrictions should be imposed to protect claimants' identities
- 2 Whether the Information Commissioner should be permitted to intervene
- 3 Jurisdiction and legal basis for reporting restriction orders
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved reporting restrictions and anonymity orders to prevent the claimants' identification, finding such measures necessary and proportionate to protect their privacy rights and the purpose of the proceedings, while balancing open justice. The Information Commissioner was permitted to intervene due to the public interest and relevance to regulatory functions.
Court Disposition
Reporting restriction and anonymity orders granted; Information Commissioner permitted to intervene.
Orders
- Claimants permitted to proceed anonymously using pseudonyms until judgment or further order.
- Publication of claimants' names or identifying details in connection with proceedings prohibited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment