Multiplex Construction Europe Ltd v Dunne [2017] EWHC 3073 (TCC) (30 November 2017)
The Advance Payment Deed, as amended, constitutes a contract of indemnity imposing a primary obligation on Mr Dunne to repay £4 million to Multiplex upon DBCE's insolvency; set-offs, counterclaims, and the Insolvency Rules do not affect this liability, and summary judgment is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 3073 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Multiplex Construction Europe Limited (formerly Brookfield Multiplex Construction Europe Limited); Defendant: Gordon Alan Dunne
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / High Court, Technology and Construction Court, Post Administration, Summary Judgment Hearing
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for the Claimant against the Defendant for £4 million.
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Vs Guarantee, Summary Judgment, Insolvency, Set Off and Counterclaim, Interpretation of Commercial Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Multiplex Construction Europe Limited (formerly Brookfield Multiplex Construction Europe Limited)
Claimant
Gordon Alan Dunne
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / High Court, Technology and Construction Court, Post Administration, Summary Judgment Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Advance Payment Deed constitutes a contract of indemnity or guarantee
- 2 Whether Mr Dunne's liability is primary or secondary
- 3 Whether set-offs or counterclaims by DBCE affect Mr Dunne's liability
Ratio Decidendi
The Advance Payment Deed, as amended, constitutes a contract of indemnity imposing a primary obligation on Mr Dunne to repay £4 million to Multiplex upon DBCE's insolvency; set-offs, counterclaims, and the Insolvency Rules do not affect this liability, and summary judgment is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for the Claimant against the Defendant for £4 million.
Orders
- Defendant to pay Claimant £4 million.
- No trial required on the merits of the claim against Mr Dunne.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment