Gordon Murray v The Information Commissioner

Gordon Murray v The Information Commissioner

The application is struck out because the tribunal lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of the underlying complaint and there are no reasonable prospects of success under section 166 DPA 1998.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Gordon Murray; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 166 Data Protection Act 1998 / Strike Out Application
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Section 166 DPA 1998, Subject Access Request, Tribunal Procedure Rules
Data Protection Administrative Law Section 166 DPA 1998 Subject Access Request Tribunal Procedure Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gordon Murray

Applicant

The Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Section 166 Data Protection Act 1998 / Strike Out Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Information Commissioner's decision under section 166 DPA 1998
  2. 2 Whether the application has reasonable prospects of success

Ratio Decidendi

The application is struck out because the tribunal lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of the underlying complaint and there are no reasonable prospects of success under section 166 DPA 1998.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • The application under section 166 of the Data Protection Act 1998 is struck out under rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.