Barnes v Barnes [1972] EWCA Civ 2 (28 July 1972)
Maintenance orders must balance the husband's ability to pay, his new obligations, and the wife's and children's needs, with social security benefits supplementing where necessary; nominal maintenance for wife was inappropriate, and a specific order should be made.
- Citation
- [1972] EWCA Civ 2
- Parties
- Petitioner/appellant: Ruth Margaret Barnes; Respondent: Gordon William Barnes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Southampton County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal against June 1971 order dismissed; appeal against March 1972 order allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance, Social Security Benefits, Financial Obligations, Remarriage, Child Support
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ruth Margaret Barnes
Petitioner/appellant
Gordon William Barnes
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Southampton County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate maintenance order for former wife and children
- 2 Impact of social security benefits on maintenance orders
- 3 Effect of husband's remarriage on maintenance obligations
Ratio Decidendi
Maintenance orders must balance the husband's ability to pay, his new obligations, and the wife's and children's needs, with social security benefits supplementing where necessary; nominal maintenance for wife was inappropriate, and a specific order should be made.
Court Disposition
Appeal against June 1971 order dismissed; appeal against March 1972 order allowed in part.
Orders
- Order of 13 March 1972 varied: wife to receive £2 per week maintenance instead of 5p nominal order; children's maintenance remains at £1.50 per week each; variations effective from date of judgment; no order as to costs except legal aid taxation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment