Goss v BM Samuels Finance Group Plc [2015] EWCA Civ 809 (10 June 2015)
The grounds of appeal do not raise any important point of principle or practice and do not satisfy the criteria for a second appeal. The further evidence sought to be admitted is speculative and incapable of supporting the applicant's defence. Permission to appeal is refused.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 809
- Parties
- Applicant: Goss; Respondent: BM Samuels Finance Group PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Permission to Appeal, Second Appeals Criteria, Admission of Further Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goss
Applicant
BM Samuels Finance Group PLC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in evaluating the evidence and concluding no breach of obligations
- 2 Whether the Master and judge failed to give sufficient weight to relevant points in summary judgment applications
- 3 Whether summary judgment should have been refused due to suspicious circumstances requiring further scrutiny
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds of appeal do not raise any important point of principle or practice and do not satisfy the criteria for a second appeal. The further evidence sought to be admitted is speculative and incapable of supporting the applicant's defence. Permission to appeal is refused.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment