Geary v Government of Canada
The appellant cannot bring himself within section 82 of the Extradition Act 2003 as the significant blame for the passage of time is his alone due to deliberate absconding; the Canadian authorities were not significantly culpable for the delay, and the passage of time has not created injustice or oppression.
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert Geary; Defendant: Government of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Section 103 of the Extradition Act 2003 / Judgment on Appeal Against Extradition Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; extradition order upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Unjust or Oppressive Extradition, Passage of Time, Delay, Jurisdictional Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Geary
Claimant
Government of Canada
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Section 103 of the Extradition Act 2003 / Judgment on Appeal Against Extradition Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extradition is barred by reason of passage of time under section 82 of the Extradition Act 2003
- 2 Whether it would be unjust or oppressive to extradite the appellant due to delay
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant cannot bring himself within section 82 of the Extradition Act 2003 as the significant blame for the passage of time is his alone due to deliberate absconding; the Canadian authorities were not significantly culpable for the delay, and the passage of time has not created injustice or oppression.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; extradition order upheld.
Orders
- No order for costs save for legal aid taxation.
- For the avoidance of doubt, the relevant date for the running of time for the purposes of section 118(5) is 31st January.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment