Graeme Bickerdike v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The Tribunal found the requests were manifestly unreasonable due to limited public interest, misrepresentation, distress caused to NH staff, and lack of serious purpose post-policy pause. The public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the interest in disclosure, and the presumption in favour of disclosure did not override this balance.
- Parties
- Appellant: Graeme Bickerdike; Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: National Highways
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Information Regulations, Manifestly Unreasonable Requests, Public Interest Test, Permitted Development Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graeme Bickerdike
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
National Highways
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant's requests for environmental information were manifestly unreasonable under regulation 12(4)(b) EIR
- 2 Whether the public interest in disclosure outweighed the public interest in maintaining the exception
- 3 Whether the presumption in favour of disclosure required release of the information
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found the requests were manifestly unreasonable due to limited public interest, misrepresentation, distress caused to NH staff, and lack of serious purpose post-policy pause. The public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the interest in disclosure, and the presumption in favour of disclosure did not override this balance.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The Information Commissioner's decision notice is upheld.
- National Highways' refusal of the requests is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment