Applause Store Productions Ltd. & Anor v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (24 July 2008)

Applause Store Productions Ltd. & Anor v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (24 July 2008)

The defendant was responsible for creating and publishing the false Facebook profile and defamatory group page. The evidence, including Facebook activity logs, IP address tracing, and the pattern of searches, overwhelmingly pointed to the defendant's involvement. The defendant's explanations were implausible and unsupported by credible evidence. The published material constituted misuse of private information and defamation of both claimants.

Citation
[2008] EWHC 1781
Parties
Claimant: Applause Store Productions Limited; Claimant: Matthew Firsht; Defendant: Grant Raphael
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the claimants
Legal Topics
Misuse of Private Information, Defamation Via Social Media, Norwich Pharmacal Orders, Expectation of Privacy, Publication of Defamatory Material
Defamation Privacy Tort Misuse of Private Information Defamation Via Social Media Norwich Pharmacal Orders Expectation of Privacy Publication of Defamatory Material

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applause Store Productions Limited

Claimant

Matthew Firsht

Claimant

Grant Raphael

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was responsible for creating and publishing a false Facebook profile and defamatory group page about the claimants
  2. 2 Whether the published material constituted misuse of private information and defamation
  3. 3 Whether the defendant's explanations and evidence rebutted liability

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant was responsible for creating and publishing the false Facebook profile and defamatory group page. The evidence, including Facebook activity logs, IP address tracing, and the pattern of searches, overwhelmingly pointed to the defendant's involvement. The defendant's explanations were implausible and unsupported by credible evidence. The published material constituted misuse of private information and defamation of both claimants.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimants

Orders

  • Defendant liable for misuse of private information and defamation
  • Damages awarded to claimants