Revenue and Customs v Grattan Plc [2009] EWHC 364 (Ch) (14 January 2009)

Revenue and Customs v Grattan Plc [2009] EWHC 364 (Ch) (14 January 2009)

There was a serious procedural irregularity in the tribunal proceedings due to non-compliance with rule 23(3) regarding notification of the hearing, which caused injustice to HMRC by preventing them from effectively presenting their case. The tribunal's exercise of discretion was legally flawed, justifying the appeal and remittal of the application to a differently constituted tribunal.

Citation
[2009] EWHC 364 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs; Defendant: Grattan plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 January 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal From VAT and Duties Tribunal Decision / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Compound Interest on Overpaid VAT, Procedural Irregularity, Tribunal Procedure, Jurisdiction of VAT Tribunal
Tax Law Administrative Law Civil Procedure Compound Interest on Overpaid VAT Procedural Irregularity Tribunal Procedure Jurisdiction of VAT Tribunal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Claimant

Grattan plc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal From VAT and Duties Tribunal Decision / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the VAT and Duties Tribunal erred in dismissing HMRC's application to strike out Grattan's appeal for compound interest on overpaid VAT
  2. 2 Whether there was a serious procedural irregularity due to non-compliance with notification requirements under rule 23 of the VAT Tribunals Rules 1986
  3. 3 Whether the tribunal's exercise of discretion was legally flawed

Ratio Decidendi

There was a serious procedural irregularity in the tribunal proceedings due to non-compliance with rule 23(3) regarding notification of the hearing, which caused injustice to HMRC by preventing them from effectively presenting their case. The tribunal's exercise of discretion was legally flawed, justifying the appeal and remittal of the application to a differently constituted tribunal.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The rule 6 application is remitted to a differently constituted tribunal.