Greenwich Contracts Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC

Greenwich Contracts Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC

The Tribunal found that Greenwich was involved in arrangements for the purposes of reducing tax, acted as a promoter, and was aware of the scheme's nature. The arrangements met the statutory hallmarks for notifiable arrangements, enabled a tax advantage, and the main benefit was the obtaining of that advantage. HMRC had reasonable grounds for suspicion, and the statutory requirements for issuing the notice and allocating the scheme reference number were met. The burden of proof rested with Greenwich, which failed to discharge it. The appeal was dismissed and HMRC's decision affirmed.

Parties
Appellant: Greenwich Contracts Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Uk) / Judgment After Full Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; HMRC's decision affirmed
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (dotas), Scheme Reference Number Allocation, Promoter Definition, Notifiable Arrangements, Burden of Proof, Employment Income Through Third Parties
Tax Law Administrative Law Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (dotas) Scheme Reference Number Allocation Promoter Definition Notifiable Arrangements Burden of Proof Employment Income Through Third Parties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 8 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Greenwich Contracts Limited

Appellant

The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Uk) / Judgment After Full Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether HMRC acted in accordance with section 310D Finance Act 2004 in issuing the notice of potential allocation of a scheme reference number
  2. 2 Whether the arrangements were notifiable arrangements under section 306 Finance Act 2004
  3. 3 Whether HMRC reasonably suspected the appellant to be a promoter or involved in the supply of the arrangements

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Greenwich was involved in arrangements for the purposes of reducing tax, acted as a promoter, and was aware of the scheme's nature. The arrangements met the statutory hallmarks for notifiable arrangements, enabled a tax advantage, and the main benefit was the obtaining of that advantage. HMRC had reasonable grounds for suspicion, and the statutory requirements for issuing the notice and allocating the scheme reference number were met. The burden of proof rested with Greenwich, which failed to discharge it. The appeal was dismissed and HMRC's decision affirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; HMRC's decision affirmed