Pearson, R (on the application of) v Greenwich Magistrates' Court
Omission of the Naylor Road address did not constitute a false statement as the form expressly instructed not to include the home where the applicant lived; no evidence of a positive act of false representation; conviction quashed.
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant/appellant: John Pearson; Respondent: Greenwich Magistrates’ Court; Respondent: London Borough of Greenwich
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review and Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Appeal and Application for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; application for judicial review withdrawn.
- Legal Topics
- False Representation, Council Tax Benefit, Judicial Review, Appeal by Case Stated
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Pearson
Applicant/claimant/appellant
Greenwich Magistrates’ Court
Respondent
London Borough of Greenwich
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review and Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Appeal and Application for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether omission of information on a Council Tax Benefit form constitutes a false statement under section 112(1) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992
- 2 Whether the form required disclosure of all properties owned
- 3 Whether the recipient's knowledge is relevant to the offence
Ratio Decidendi
Omission of the Naylor Road address did not constitute a false statement as the form expressly instructed not to include the home where the applicant lived; no evidence of a positive act of false representation; conviction quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; application for judicial review withdrawn.
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Conditional discharge quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment