Greenwood, R. v [2010] EWHC 90171 (Costs) (05 January 2010)
The correct calculation for the original litigator's graduated fee is based on the number of pages of prosecution evidence served at the point of transfer, as per the Funding Order and accompanying guidance. The appeal fails as the claim must be based on the PPE at transfer, not at the end of the case.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 90171 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Regina; Defendant: Greenwood; Applicant Solicitors: David Charnley & Co
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal / Appeal From Legal Services Commission Assessment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Litigator Graduated Fee Scheme, Transfer of Representation, Calculation of PPE (pages of Prosecution Evidence), Public Funding of Defence Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Claimant
Greenwood
Defendant
David Charnley & Co
Applicant Solicitors
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal / Appeal From Legal Services Commission Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original firm is entitled to a graduated fee based on the final page count of PPE at the conclusion of the case or only the pages served at the point of transfer
- 2 Interpretation of 'total fee' under the Criminal Defence Service (Funding) Order 2007
Ratio Decidendi
The correct calculation for the original litigator's graduated fee is based on the number of pages of prosecution evidence served at the point of transfer, as per the Funding Order and accompanying guidance. The appeal fails as the claim must be based on the PPE at transfer, not at the end of the case.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The sum of £400 (exclusive of VAT) for costs and the £100 paid on appeal should be made to the Applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment