Thames Water Utilities Holdings, Re [2024] EWHC 3310 (Ch) (17 December 2024)
The court granted directions to convene seven class meetings of Plan Creditors, finding that the proposed classes reflect material differences in rights, that the Plan Company meets the statutory conditions for proposing a restructuring plan under Part 26A Companies Act 2006, that sufficient notice was given, and that no jurisdictional or procedural barriers exist. The court held that the existence of an alternative proposal does not affect class constitution at this stage and that the only material differences in rights are those relating to priority ranking and make-whole provisions.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 3310 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant Plan Company: Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd; Respondent: Group of Class A Plan Creditors; Respondent: Group of Class B Plan Creditors; Interested Parties: Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets and BNP Paribas; Interested Parties: Thames Water Limited and certain creditors of Kemble Water Finance Limited and Thames Water (Kemble) Finance Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Restructuring Plan Convening Application / Directions Hearing for Convening Creditor Meetings
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Restructuring Plan, Scheme of Arrangement, Class Constitution, Cross Class Cram Down, Jurisdiction Under Companies Act 2006 Part 26 a
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd
Applicant Plan Company
Group of Class A Plan Creditors
Respondent
Group of Class B Plan Creditors
Respondent
Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets and BNP Paribas
Interested Parties
Thames Water Limited and certain creditors of Kemble Water Finance Limited and Thames Water (Kemble) Finance Plc
Interested Parties
Procedural Posture
Restructuring Plan Convening Application / Directions Hearing for Convening Creditor Meetings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant directions to convene creditor meetings for a restructuring plan under Part 26A Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether proposed creditor classes are properly constituted
- 3 Whether court has jurisdiction to sanction the plan
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted directions to convene seven class meetings of Plan Creditors, finding that the proposed classes reflect material differences in rights, that the Plan Company meets the statutory conditions for proposing a restructuring plan under Part 26A Companies Act 2006, that sufficient notice was given, and that no jurisdictional or procedural barriers exist. The court held that the existence of an alternative proposal does not affect class constitution at this stage and that the only material differences in rights are those relating to priority ranking and make-whole provisions.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Directions given for convening seven class meetings of Plan Creditors as proposed by the Plan Company
- Directions for conduct of meetings and preparation for sanction hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment