Twintec Ltd v GSE Building and Civil Engineering Ltd
A binding contract was formed between Twintec and GSE at the latest on 13 August 2001, when GSE accepted Twintec’s modified offer for a fixed price, lump sum, all risks contract for £637,897.46, as evidenced by the meeting on 2 August 2001 and GSE’s letter of 13 August 2001. All essential terms were agreed, and the description of the letter as a letter of intent did not prevent contract formation.
- Parties
- Claimant: Twintec Limited; Defendant: GSE Building and Civil Engineering Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contract/construction) / Trial of Liability Issues Only
- Outcome
- Liability found for the claimant (Twintec).
- Legal Topics
- Formation of Contract, Letters of Intent, Repudiation, Quantum Meruit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Twintec Limited
Claimant
GSE Building and Civil Engineering Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract/construction) / Trial of Liability Issues Only
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding contract was formed between Twintec and GSE in August 2001
- 2 Whether GSE repudiated the contract with Twintec
- 3 Whether Twintec is entitled to quantum meruit if no contract was formed
Ratio Decidendi
A binding contract was formed between Twintec and GSE at the latest on 13 August 2001, when GSE accepted Twintec’s modified offer for a fixed price, lump sum, all risks contract for £637,897.46, as evidenced by the meeting on 2 August 2001 and GSE’s letter of 13 August 2001. All essential terms were agreed, and the description of the letter as a letter of intent did not prevent contract formation.
Court Disposition
Liability found for the claimant (Twintec).
Orders
- Declaration that a binding contract was formed between Twintec and GSE on or about 13 August 2001 for the external slab work at the B & Q site, Belvedere, for £637,897.46 on a fixed price, lump sum, all risks basis.
- If no contract had been found, GSE’s letter of 13 August 2001 would have entitled Twintec to a quantum meruit or reasonable sum for works carried out and costs incurred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment