R v Kola
The appeal is dismissed because the solicitors failed to demonstrate that all of the electronic evidence (phone download) was sufficiently important to be counted as PPE; only the communications aspects were properly allowed by the determining officer.
- Parties
- Appellant: GSG Law Ltd; Defendant: Lorenc Kola; Respondent: The Determining Officer / Legal Aid Agency
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal (criminal Legal Aid) / Appeal From Determining Officer's PPE Calculation
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Litigators' Graduated Fee, Prosecution Evidence (ppe), Electronic Evidence, Remuneration Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GSG Law Ltd
Appellant
Lorenc Kola
Defendant
The Determining Officer / Legal Aid Agency
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal (criminal Legal Aid) / Appeal From Determining Officer's PPE Calculation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether all pages of electronic evidence (phone download) should be counted as PPE for the purposes of the litigators’ graduated fee under the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013
- 2 Whether the solicitors demonstrated the sufficient importance of the electronic evidence to justify its inclusion as PPE
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the solicitors failed to demonstrate that all of the electronic evidence (phone download) was sufficiently important to be counted as PPE; only the communications aspects were properly allowed by the determining officer.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No change to the determining officer’s PPE calculation
- No additional PPE allowed for the phone download
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment