GT v RJ
The application for relocation is dismissed because the mother failed to demonstrate that the proposed change would be more in the children's interests than maintaining their familiar life in London. The court found the case manipulative and lacking candour, with concerns about compliance and negative influence from the mother's new husband. The best interests of the children require their return to London under the mother's primary care, with frequent contact to the father.
- Parties
- Applicant: GT; Respondent and Cross Applicant: RJ
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act Relocation Application / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Relocation of Children, Best Interests of the Child, Child Arrangements, Parental Responsibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GT
Applicant
RJ
Respondent and Cross Applicant
Procedural Posture
Children Act Relocation Application / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother should be granted permission to relocate the children from the UK to Ukraine
- 2 Whether the father's consent to relocation was unreasonably withheld
- 3 Assessment of the children's best interests under section 1(3) Children Act 1989
Ratio Decidendi
The application for relocation is dismissed because the mother failed to demonstrate that the proposed change would be more in the children's interests than maintaining their familiar life in London. The court found the case manipulative and lacking candour, with concerns about compliance and negative influence from the mother's new husband. The best interests of the children require their return to London under the mother's primary care, with frequent contact to the father.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Children to return to London under mother's primary care
- Father's contact to resume in London as before 25 November 2017
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment