Bentley Motors Ltd v GTI Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 148 (08 February 2016)

Bentley Motors Ltd v GTI Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 148 (08 February 2016)

The Defendant's revised offer adequately protects the position of both parties pending trial, and there is no real prospect of success on appeal against the refusal of the interim mandatory injunction.

Citation
[2016] EWCA Civ 148
Parties
Claimant: Bentley Motors Limited; Defendant: GTI Corporation
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Supply Contracts, Termination of Contract, Adequacy of Remedies
Contract Law Commercial Law Interim Injunctions Supply Contracts Termination of Contract Adequacy of Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bentley Motors Limited

Claimant

GTI Corporation

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an interim mandatory injunction should be granted pending trial
  2. 2 Adequacy of remedies for breach of contract
  3. 3 Irremediable prejudice to parties

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant's revised offer adequately protects the position of both parties pending trial, and there is no real prospect of success on appeal against the refusal of the interim mandatory injunction.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused