Y & K (children) , Re

The judge erred in terminating the proceedings prematurely and in rejecting the agreed and cogent expert medical evidence; the fact-finding exercise was incomplete and required a retrial.

Parties: Mother / First Respondent: KY; Father / Second Respondent: AK; Applicant / Appellant: Newcastle-upon-Tyne City Council; Appellant: Guardian ad litem
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 07 April 2003
Procedural Posture: Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Appeal From Preliminary Fact Finding Hearing
Outcome: Appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Care Proceedings, Split Hearings, Compellability of Witnesses, Expert Medical Evidence, Threshold Criteria Under Children Act 1989

Family Law Child Protection Care Proceedings Split Hearings Compellability of Witnesses Expert Medical Evidence Threshold Criteria Under Children Act 1989

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mother / First Respondent

Father / Second Respondent

Newcastle-upon-Tyne City Council

Applicant / Appellant

Guardian ad litem

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Appeal From Preliminary Fact Finding Hearing

Legal Issues

1 Whether the judge erred in terminating care proceedings at the preliminary fact-finding stage
2 Whether the judge wrongly rejected expert medical evidence
3 Whether parents can be compelled to give evidence in care proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The judge erred in terminating the proceedings prematurely and in rejecting the agreed and cogent expert medical evidence; the fact-finding exercise was incomplete and required a retrial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

Case remitted for retrial before a section 9 judge or a circuit judge nominated by the liaison judge
No order for costs