Campbell-James v Guardian Media Group Plc

Campbell-James v Guardian Media Group Plc

The court held that the libel was grave, causing lasting reputational and security harm to the claimant, and that the defendant's delayed apology and offer of amends warranted a 35% discount from a starting point of £90,000, resulting in an award of £58,500.

Parties
Claimant: Jonathan Campbell-James; Defendant: Guardian Media Group plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Assessment of Damages Following Offer of Amends
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant; damages assessed.
Legal Topics
Defamation, Libel, Damages, Offer of Amends, Apology, Mitigation
Tort Media Law Defamation Libel Damages Offer of Amends Apology Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonathan Campbell-James

Claimant

Guardian Media Group plc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation / Assessment of Damages Following Offer of Amends

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate amount of compensation for the libel published by the defendant about the claimant?
  2. 2 What discount should be applied to damages in light of the defendant's offer of amends and apology?

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the libel was grave, causing lasting reputational and security harm to the claimant, and that the defendant's delayed apology and offer of amends warranted a 35% discount from a starting point of £90,000, resulting in an award of £58,500.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant; damages assessed.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay claimant £58,500 in damages.