Campbell-James v Guardian Media Group Plc [2005] EWHC 893 (QB) (12 May 2005)
The appropriate starting point for damages, reflecting the gravity and lasting impact of the libel, is £90,000. A 35% discount is justified due to the defendant's eventual offer of amends and apology, but the delay and dismissive attitude reduce the extent of mitigation. The final award is £58,500.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 893
- Parties
- Claimant: Jonathan Campbell-James; Defendant: Guardian Media Group plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation Claim Under S.3(5) of the Defamation Act 1996 / Assessment of Compensation Following Offer of Amends
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant. Compensation assessed at £58,500.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Damages Assessment, Offer of Amends, Apology and Mitigation, Reputation, Security Risk From Publication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jonathan Campbell-James
Claimant
Guardian Media Group plc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation Claim Under S.3(5) of the Defamation Act 1996 / Assessment of Compensation Following Offer of Amends
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate level of compensation for the libel published by the defendant linking the claimant to Abu Ghraib abuses?
- 2 What discount should be applied to damages in light of the defendant's offer of amends and published apology?
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate starting point for damages, reflecting the gravity and lasting impact of the libel, is £90,000. A 35% discount is justified due to the defendant's eventual offer of amends and apology, but the delay and dismissive attitude reduce the extent of mitigation. The final award is £58,500.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant. Compensation assessed at £58,500.
Orders
- Defendant to pay the claimant £58,500 in compensation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment