Campbell-James v Guardian Media Group Plc [2005] EWHC 893 (QB) (12 May 2005)

Campbell-James v Guardian Media Group Plc [2005] EWHC 893 (QB) (12 May 2005)

The appropriate award for this serious libel, considering its gravity, lasting impact, and the defendant's delayed apology and offer of amends, is £58,500, reflecting a 35% discount from a starting point of £90,000 due to the mitigating effect of the offer of amends and apology, but reduced by the delay and initial stance of the defendant.

Citation
[2005] EWHC 893 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Jonathan Campbell-James; Defendant: Guardian Media Group plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Defamation Assessment of Damages / Judgment Following Application for Assessment of Compensation Under S.3(5) Defamation Act 1996
Outcome
Claim allowed. Judgment for the claimant.
Legal Topics
Libel, Damages Assessment, Offer of Amends, Apology, Mitigation of Damages
Defamation Media Law Tort Libel Damages Assessment Offer of Amends Apology Mitigation of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonathan Campbell-James

Claimant

Guardian Media Group plc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation Assessment of Damages / Judgment Following Application for Assessment of Compensation Under S.3(5) Defamation Act 1996

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate amount of compensation for the libel published by The Guardian linking the claimant to Abu Ghraib abuses?
  2. 2 What discount should be applied to damages in light of the defendant's offer of amends and published apology?

Ratio Decidendi

The appropriate award for this serious libel, considering its gravity, lasting impact, and the defendant's delayed apology and offer of amends, is £58,500, reflecting a 35% discount from a starting point of £90,000 due to the mitigating effect of the offer of amends and apology, but reduced by the delay and initial stance of the defendant.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed. Judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay £58,500 in compensation to the claimant.