Chan v Alvis Vehicles Ltd & Anor
The court has jurisdiction under CPR 5.4(5)(b) to grant access to documents on the court file after settlement; the principle of open justice and the press's legitimate interest in reporting outweigh general assertions of confidentiality, and the timing of the application does not bar access.
- Parties
- Claimant: Chan U Seek; Defendant: Alvis Vehicles Ltd; Applicant: Guardian Newspapers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Post Settlement Application for Access to Court Documents
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Open Justice, Access to Court Records, Press Rights, Disclosure of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chan U Seek
Claimant
Alvis Vehicles Ltd
Defendant
Guardian Newspapers
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Application / Post Settlement Application for Access to Court Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a non-party (the press) may obtain copies of court documents after settlement under CPR 5.4(5)(b)
- 2 Whether the principle of open justice requires disclosure of pleadings and witness statements to the press
- 3 Whether timing of application post-settlement affects the court's discretion to grant access
Ratio Decidendi
The court has jurisdiction under CPR 5.4(5)(b) to grant access to documents on the court file after settlement; the principle of open justice and the press's legitimate interest in reporting outweigh general assertions of confidentiality, and the timing of the application does not bar access.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Guardian Newspapers permitted to inspect and copy Particulars of Claim, Defence, Reply, and witness statements of six named Alvis witnesses from the court file
- Alvis Vehicles Ltd to pay Guardian Newspapers' costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment