Halton International (Holidings) Sarl & Anor v Guernroy Ltd & Ors [2007] EWHC 2773 (Ch) (25 October 2007)

Halton International (Holidings) Sarl & Anor v Guernroy Ltd & Ors [2007] EWHC 2773 (Ch) (25 October 2007)

The application to vary or revoke the condition requiring payment of £730,000 as security for costs is refused because it was made very late without a good explanation, contrary to the requirement for promptness and detailed evidence. The applicant failed to comply with court orders, and the evidence did not establish that the condition stifled the appeal due to impecuniosity alone, especially given the close connection and funding by Dr Tabbara, who was not shown to be impecunious. The interests of finality in litigation and the administration of justice outweigh the applicant's arguments.

Citation
[2007] EWHC 2773 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Halton International (Holdings) SARL; Claimant: Mr Kaddoura; Defendant: Guernroy Limited; Defendant: Ecan Management Incorporated; Non Party (for Costs): Dr Tabbara
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 October 2007
Procedural Posture
High Court Chancery Division Civil Appeal (costs) / Application to Vary Condition of Permission to Appeal (security for Costs)
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Permission to Appeal, Non Party Costs Orders, Impecuniosity, Relief From Sanctions, Access to Justice, Article 6 ECHR
Civil Procedure Costs Security for Costs Permission to Appeal Non Party Costs Orders Impecuniosity Relief From Sanctions Access to Justice +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Halton International (Holdings) SARL

Claimant

Mr Kaddoura

Claimant

Guernroy Limited

Defendant

Ecan Management Incorporated

Defendant

Dr Tabbara

Non Party (for Costs)

Procedural Posture

High Court Chancery Division Civil Appeal (costs) / Application to Vary Condition of Permission to Appeal (security for Costs)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the condition imposed (payment of £730,000 as security for costs) on permission to appeal should be varied or revoked due to the applicant's impecuniosity and inability to comply;
  2. 2 Whether the delay in making the application to vary the condition is fatal;
  3. 3 Whether the condition imposed stifles the appeal and breaches Article 6 ECHR (right to a fair trial);

Ratio Decidendi

The application to vary or revoke the condition requiring payment of £730,000 as security for costs is refused because it was made very late without a good explanation, contrary to the requirement for promptness and detailed evidence. The applicant failed to comply with court orders, and the evidence did not establish that the condition stifled the appeal due to impecuniosity alone, especially given the close connection and funding by Dr Tabbara, who was not shown to be impecunious. The interests of finality in litigation and the administration of justice outweigh the applicant's arguments.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Application to vary or revoke the condition requiring payment of £730,000 as security for costs is dismissed.
  • No variation or revocation of the condition imposed by Lawrence Collins J on 9 November 2006.