Halton International (Holidings) Sarl & Anor v Guernroy Ltd & Ors
The application to vary or revoke the condition imposed on permission to appeal was made very late without good explanation; Halton's impecuniosity does not justify relief because Dr Tabbara, the effective party, has sufficient resources and stands to benefit from the appeal; the original condition was appropriate and should not be revoked.
- Parties
- Claimant: Halton International (Holdings) SARL; Claimant: Mr Kaddoura; Defendant: Guernroy Limited; Defendant: Ecan Management Incorporated; Non Party (for Costs Only): Dr Tabbara
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Ruling on Application to Vary Condition Imposed on Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Impecuniosity, Conditional Permission to Appeal, Non Party Costs Orders, Relief From Sanctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Halton International (Holdings) SARL
Claimant
Mr Kaddoura
Claimant
Guernroy Limited
Defendant
Ecan Management Incorporated
Defendant
Dr Tabbara
Non Party (for Costs Only)
Procedural Posture
Application / Ruling on Application to Vary Condition Imposed on Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the condition imposed on permission to appeal should be varied or revoked due to Halton's impecuniosity
- 2 Whether the financial position of Dr Tabbara should be considered in assessing the application
- 3 Whether delay in making the application is fatal to relief sought
Ratio Decidendi
The application to vary or revoke the condition imposed on permission to appeal was made very late without good explanation; Halton's impecuniosity does not justify relief because Dr Tabbara, the effective party, has sufficient resources and stands to benefit from the appeal; the original condition was appropriate and should not be revoked.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application under CPR Rule 52.9(1)(c) dismissed
- Application under CPR Rule 3.1(7) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment