R (on the application of Gujra) v Crown Prosecution Service
The Director of Public Prosecutions' policy to take over and discontinue private prosecutions unless there is a reasonable prospect of conviction does not frustrate the policy and objects of section 6 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. The policy is a lawful exercise of discretion and does not unlawfully restrict the right to bring a private prosecution. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gujra; Respondent: Crown Prosecution Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Private Prosecution, Director of Public Prosecutions' Discretion, Judicial Review, Access to Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gujra
Appellant
Crown Prosecution Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the Director of Public Prosecutions' 2009 policy to take over and discontinue private prosecutions unless there is a reasonable prospect of conviction lawful?
- 2 Does the policy unlawfully restrict the statutory right to bring a private prosecution under section 6 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985?
Ratio Decidendi
The Director of Public Prosecutions' policy to take over and discontinue private prosecutions unless there is a reasonable prospect of conviction does not frustrate the policy and objects of section 6 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. The policy is a lawful exercise of discretion and does not unlawfully restrict the right to bring a private prosecution. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment