R v Gurpal Raytt
The applicant could not be guilty of failing to surrender to bail as he was not on bail but under summons; the conviction was unlawful and must be quashed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gurpal Raytt; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Surrender to Bail, Extension of Time to Appeal, Quashing Conviction, Community Order Breach
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Gurpal Raytt
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully convicted of failing to surrender to bail when he was not on bail but under summons
- 2 Whether the conviction and resulting sentence should be quashed
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant could not be guilty of failing to surrender to bail as he was not on bail but under summons; the conviction was unlawful and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Orders
- Time to appeal extended and leave to appeal granted
- Conviction for failing to surrender to bail quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment