R v Gurpal Raytt

R v Gurpal Raytt

The applicant could not be guilty of failing to surrender to bail as he was not on bail but under summons; the conviction was unlawful and must be quashed.

Parties
Applicant: Gurpal Raytt; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Failure to Surrender to Bail, Extension of Time to Appeal, Quashing Conviction, Community Order Breach

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gurpal Raytt

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully convicted of failing to surrender to bail when he was not on bail but under summons
  2. 2 Whether the conviction and resulting sentence should be quashed

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant could not be guilty of failing to surrender to bail as he was not on bail but under summons; the conviction was unlawful and must be quashed.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; conviction quashed

Orders

  • Time to appeal extended and leave to appeal granted
  • Conviction for failing to surrender to bail quashed