Edwards v Edwards [2002] EWCA Civ 1802 (18 November 2002)
The judge erred by placing undue weight on expert psychiatric evidence and failing to properly investigate the wife's evidence of feigned incapacity and to balance the consequences of adjournment on both parties' mental health. The order for adjournment was set aside and the application for adjournment refused.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1802
- Parties
- Petitioner/applicant: Daphne Caroline Edwards; Respondent: Guy Ritchie Goronwy Edwards
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Adjournment of Proceedings, Mental Capacity, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daphne Caroline Edwards
Petitioner/applicant
Guy Ritchie Goronwy Edwards
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjournment of ancillary relief proceedings was justified based on the respondent's psychiatric condition
- 2 Whether the judge erred by relying solely on expert evidence and failing to balance the impact on both parties
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred by placing undue weight on expert psychiatric evidence and failing to properly investigate the wife's evidence of feigned incapacity and to balance the consequences of adjournment on both parties' mental health. The order for adjournment was set aside and the application for adjournment refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order for adjournment set aside
- Application for adjournment refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment