W v H (Contested Divorce) [2022] EWFC 150 (B) (02 November 2022)
The Respondent's behaviour, viewed holistically and in light of his autism, cumulatively meets the threshold under s1(2)(b) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 such that the Petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with him. The marriage is valid and irretrievably broken down.
- Citation
- [2022] EWFC 150 (B)
- Parties
- Petitioner: W; Respondent: H
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Contested Divorce / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Petition granted; decree of divorce pronounced.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, Behaviour Grounds, Vulnerable Parties, Autism in Legal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W
Petitioner
H
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contested Divorce / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent's behaviour meets the threshold under s1(2)(b) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 such that the Petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with him
- 2 Consideration of Respondent's autism in the context of behaviour
- 3 Validity of marriage
Ratio Decidendi
The Respondent's behaviour, viewed holistically and in light of his autism, cumulatively meets the threshold under s1(2)(b) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 such that the Petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with him. The marriage is valid and irretrievably broken down.
Court Disposition
Petition granted; decree of divorce pronounced.
Orders
- Decree of divorce granted under s1(2)(b) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
- Participation directions for vulnerable parties approved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment