CC, R (On the Application Of) v HM Treasury & Anor
The Secretary of State has no legal power to make the additional payments sought, as the statutory scheme for Carer’s Allowance is comprehensive and exclusive. Any increase beyond the statutory uprating is a matter for Parliament. Section 76 of the Coronavirus Act 2020 does not confer the necessary power. Without vires, the human rights and irrationality claims cannot succeed. The comparators relied on for discrimination are not in analogous positions, and the government’s choices were rational and justified.
- Parties
- Claimant: CC; Defendant: H. M. Treasury; Defendant: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application to Amend Claim Form and Statement of Facts and Grounds
- Outcome
- Application to amend claim refused; claim for judicial review at an end.
- Legal Topics
- Carer's Allowance, COVID 19 Financial Support, Judicial Review Procedure, Statutory Powers and Vires, Discrimination (sex and Other Status), Human Rights Act 1998, Irrationality at Common Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CC
Claimant
H. M. Treasury
Defendant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application to Amend Claim Form and Statement of Facts and Grounds
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State had legal power to make additional payments to Carer's Allowance recipients not on Universal Credit due to COVID-19
- 2 Whether failure to make such payments was unlawful discrimination under ECHR Article 14
- 3 Whether the decision was irrational at common law
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State has no legal power to make the additional payments sought, as the statutory scheme for Carer’s Allowance is comprehensive and exclusive. Any increase beyond the statutory uprating is a matter for Parliament. Section 76 of the Coronavirus Act 2020 does not confer the necessary power. Without vires, the human rights and irrationality claims cannot succeed. The comparators relied on for discrimination are not in analogous positions, and the government’s choices were rational and justified.
Court Disposition
Application to amend claim refused; claim for judicial review at an end.
Orders
- Refusal of permission to amend the Claim Form and Grounds
- Claim for judicial review dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment