A (A Child : Foreign Surrogacy : South Africa)

A (A Child : Foreign Surrogacy : South Africa)

All statutory criteria under section 54 HFEA 2008 are satisfied, including domicile, consent, and permitted payments. A's lifelong welfare is best served by making a parental order, ensuring legal consistency across jurisdictions.

Parties
Applicant: H; Applicant: M; Respondent: C
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Parental Order Application / Judgment
Outcome
parental order granted
Legal Topics
Surrogacy, Parental Orders, Domicile, Child Welfare
Family Law Surrogacy Parental Orders Domicile Child Welfare

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

H

Applicant

M

Applicant

C

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Parental Order Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the criteria under section 54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 are satisfied
  2. 2 Whether the lifelong welfare needs of the child A are met by making a parental order

Ratio Decidendi

All statutory criteria under section 54 HFEA 2008 are satisfied, including domicile, consent, and permitted payments. A's lifelong welfare is best served by making a parental order, ensuring legal consistency across jurisdictions.

Court Disposition

parental order granted

Orders

  • A parental order is made in favour of the applicants H and M securing their legal status as parents of A.