Traditional Structures Ltd v HW Construction Ltd
The court found that the defendant had actual knowledge of the claimant's mistake in omitting the cladding price, failed to draw attention to it, and acted unconscionably. Rectification was granted to include the cladding price. Alternatively, the claimant was entitled to a reasonable price for the cladding work under an implied term, as all other contract terms were sufficiently detailed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Traditional Structures Limited; Defendant: H W Construction Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Rectification for Unilateral Mistake, Implied Terms, Reasonable Price, Construction Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Traditional Structures Limited
Claimant
H W Construction Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contract should be rectified for unilateral mistake to include the omitted price for cladding
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a reasonable price for cladding under an implied term
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant had actual knowledge of the claimant's mistake in omitting the cladding price, failed to draw attention to it, and acted unconscionably. Rectification was granted to include the cladding price. Alternatively, the claimant was entitled to a reasonable price for the cladding work under an implied term, as all other contract terms were sufficiently detailed.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Rectification of the contract to include the cladding price
- Alternatively, payment of a reasonable price for the cladding work
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment