Haddonhall Residents' TMO v The Pensions Regulator
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Posture
- Appeal / Struck Out Without Hearing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with a direction to provide a copy of the decision being challenged within the specified time.
Court disposition
Appeal struck out
Orders
- The appeal is struck out pursuant to Rule 8(3)(a) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2008.
02
Material facts
Parties
Haddonhall Residents’ TMO
AppellantThe Pensions Regulator
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Appeal / Struck Out Without Hearing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the appeal should be struck out for failure to comply with tribunal directions
Party arguments
- Applicant
- No argument submitted; appellant failed to provide required documents.
- Respondent
- No argument recorded; matter decided on procedural non-compliance.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 8(3)(a) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2008
A tribunal may strike out a case for failure to comply with its directions.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with a direction to provide a copy of the decision being challenged within the specified time.
Court disposition
Appeal struck out
- The appeal is struck out pursuant to Rule 8(3)(a) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2008.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
Neutral citation number: [2026] UKFTT 00261 (GRC) First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Pensions Case Reference: FT/PEN/2025/0285 Decided without a hearing Decision given on: 27 February 2026 Before
JUDGE SANGER Between HADDONHALL RESIDENTS’ TMO and
THE PENSIONS REGULATOR Appellant Respondent Decision: The appeal is struck out pursuant to Rule 8(3)(a) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2008.
REASONS 1. The Appellant lodged an appeal using the GRC1 form on 11 th November 2025. The appeal was incomplete as the Appellant did not include a copy of the decision they sought to challenge.
2. By Directions and an email issued on 30th December 2025 the Appellant was required to provide a copy of the decision to the Tribunal within 28 days.
3. The Appellant was directed to note that failure to comply with the Direction could lead to the Tribunal striking out the appeal for failure to comply without further direction.
4. The Tribunal has received no further documents or correspondence from the Appellant.
5. The Appellant failed to comply with the Direction dated 30th December 2025 and there are grounds to strike out the appeal. Signed Date: Judge Sanger 19th February 2026 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.