Halford v Hampshire Constabulary [2002] EWCA Civ 1464 (25 September 2002)
Permission to appeal is granted because the grounds relating to malice and qualified privilege have a real prospect of success; the judge may have erred in withdrawing the issue of malice from the jury and in his findings on qualified privilege.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1464
- Parties
- Applicant: Halford; Respondents: Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary and Another
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal and Extension of Time / Permission to Appeal Hearing Before Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Slander, Malicious Falsehood, Qualified Privilege, Malice, Fair Trial (article 6 Echr)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Halford
Applicant
Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary and Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal and Extension of Time / Permission to Appeal Hearing Before Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in withdrawing the issue of malice from the jury
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in making findings of fact on qualified privilege
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in denying a fair trial under Article 6 ECHR by allowing late amendments and oral evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted because the grounds relating to malice and qualified privilege have a real prospect of success; the judge may have erred in withdrawing the issue of malice from the jury and in his findings on qualified privilege.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted on all grounds
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment